Real History Blog: Priorities - YES on HR 811
The bill in question, HR 811, the bill Rush
Holt put forward, offers a substantial hand
count of 100% of the ballots (defined as the
paper, not electronic, record, in the bill's
explicit language) in from 3-10% of the
precincts, depending on the margin of the
victory. The closer the victory, the more
ballots will be counted. The wider the
margin, the fewer ballots to audit to verify
the results. So Holt's bill offers my dream
solution - a system in which machine counts
and hand counts are used to count our votes.
HR 811: Separating Truth From Fiction in
E-voting Reform HR 811 is not
perfect. Few bills are. And honest
debate about a matter as important as
election integrity is always helpful to the
process. However, much of the ostensibly
pro-transparency criticism of HR 811 has
sadly taken a detour away from being
useful and descended into hyperbole,
fear-mongering, and uninformed
posturing. Returning to the substance of
the bill and its actual consequences is
long overdue. What would HR 811 do?
|
|